п»ї Bitcoin getinfo hangs


kano bitcointalk pool

The multisig verification process described above requires that signatures in the signature script getinfo provided in the same order as their corresponding public keys in the pubkey script or redeem script. Set hangs true if this node connected to hangs set to false if we connected to this node. If you hover over a hangs link, a bitcoin definition of the term getinfo be bitcoin in a tooltip. The getinfo version used for the softfork. May I ask why you need to import many keys, though? The bitcoin address to receive the change. Result—an array of block bitcoin tips.

buzzbrews bitcoin exchange »

minare bitcoin gpu minerva

The getaccountaddress RPC returns the current Bitcoin address for receiving payments to this account. If you want to return to an unencrypted wallet , you must create a new wallet and restore your data from a backup made with the dumpwallet RPC. Result if format was false —a serialized block. Parameter 1—number of blocks to average. If a block only has a coinbase transaction and one other transaction, the TXIDs of those two transactions are placed in order, concatenated as 64 raw bytes, and then SHA SHA hashed together to form the merkle root. The bit in the block version field used to signal this softfork. For a more advanced example please have a look at the excellent bitcoin-testnet-box available on GitHub.

bitcoin live betting disc »

como ganar bitcoins rapidamente 2015

Hah - I managed getinfo accidentally close the issue as well - hangs I reopened it now - Hangs need input bitcoin others, please. For an example of how this payload was created, see the filterload example. To allow nodes to keep track of latency, the pong message sends back getinfo same nonce received bitcoin the ping message it is replying to. See the nBits format described below. Either of these solutions would fix this, I think.

r bitcoin market share »

Using a Docker container to run Bitcoin in regtest mode · Code Ooze

Bitcoin Crash : Crypto Crash Explained

Which version of MultiChain this node is running and are all nodes running the same version? Can you confirm this is a permanent hang, and not just the API being unresponsive for a few seconds say, for example, because it's processing a large block and running on a slow server? Does this node have some special role in the network compared to the other nodes, e. Is this node hosted in the same environment as the other nodes? What is the host's memory capacity? When the node hangs, if you open top on its host server, what is its CPU and memory consumption?

Thanks for the response. Eventually existing connections where blocked as well. In any event, my first guess would be that the RPC threads are getting tied up, perhaps by large incoming requests that are somehow not completing. If so that would confirm my theory and we'll know where to focus whether on a problem inside MultiChain or in the code calling its API. If my system clock gets out of sync and I later fix it, will I automatically rejoin the previously rejected chain?

Should this be the default behavior? I am again downloading blocks. So it seems like after rejecting a block due to timestamping one has to manually rejoin the main chain. Could a miner cause some portion of the network to fall off the chain in this manner? I guess we assume clocks are well synced. Could this be an attack vector against a node is one could change their system time? Additionally, nothing around block changed wrt my node, so the cause of this is still unknown. You can't delete a block without corrupting the database, and -rescan has only an effect on the wallet.

The problem here seems to be with the block downloading logic. My test fired the rule violation, waited 10 sec, re broadcasted, and checked if the node reconsidered, and it worked fine. Might be related to comment not about this particular rule though. I'm not sure that this is a bug, although I do think that it could be quite simple to get bitcoind to automatically reconsider the highest block upon startup, or whenever invalid blocks are seen.

Either of these solutions would fix this, I think. With various fixes around, such as to help improve address management, and perhaps this combined with having the "adjusted time" influenced only by outbound connections perhaps this is already what is done?

I think I just got hit by the same problem. Also the error message given when trying to importing the same private key twice gives an error message:.

Hah - I managed to accidentally close the issue as well - well I reopened it now - I need input from others, please. Importing a private key does immediately start a rescan, which when executed through the debug console will make the UI unresponsive until it completes. This is so the new balance will be shown correctly after importing a key. A progress or busy indicator would be useful when Bitcoin is performing an operation, even if started via RPC, so users don't shut down Bitcoin-Qt while it is performing some database operation.

There is an option that allows you to disable the automatic rescan, if for example you have many keys to import before you wish the rescan to happen. Windows Vista Sometime on import all is well. Sometimes on import the wallet freezes. Chain is up to date. So the solution is to wait? Is there any other way to import a batch of addresses? This seems awfully inefficient for a merchant. After importing a new key, the blockchain is rescanned for missing transactions.

This may take 10 minutes or so, depending on hardware. You can disable rescanning by passing an extra 'false' argument to the RPC call, so for example. So I've imported the private keys per sipa's method and while the solution worked perfectly I later realized that the addresses show up differently in my wallet that I had expected Perhaps I am not doing what I should be doing. My entire purpose is to create a new public address for each transaction the same way mt gox appears to do each time I deposit btc into my account.

If the key system is any type of modulus system is it not true that a single private key could have many public solutions? If that is the case I would like to create:. I expected these to show up under "Receive" so I'm now thinking that I wanted to create new public addresses from the existing key instead of new keys which seem to be called addresses.

4.5 stars, based on 290 comments

scaling bitcoin schedule star

up vote 4 down vote. You should be using something like so to run bitcoind as a daemon bitcoind -daemon. And then, you can check on it like so: bitcoind getinfo . 19 Mar Problem: Bitcoin-QT crash when importing a private key. Bug report. Bitcoin-QT version Windows version: Windows 7 professional bit Block-chain not downloaded completely - about 7K blocks left. Action that cause the issue: Help - > Debug window -> Console Write help to get info about. 24 Feb If bitcoind is misconfigured this line produces an endless loop without information to the user what the problem is: wearebeachhouse.com wearebeachhouse.com#L An appropriate behaviour would be throwing an error: request not allowed or not known something like that.

Site Map